bug#69528: 30.0.50; [BUG] transient.el is not a member of package--builtin-versions

[Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>>> 2. The way I read the manual, it seems like "Package-Version" should be
>>>    preferred over "Version", if it exists:
>>>
>>>         ‘Package-Version’
>>>              If ‘Version’ is not suitable for use by the package manager, then a
>>>              package can define ‘Package-Version’; it will be used instead.
>>>              This is handy if ‘Version’ is an RCS id or something else that
>>>              cannot be parsed by ‘version-to-list’.
>>
>> FWIW I use this for some of my own scripts that I version using RCS, so
>> I'd appreciate it if that functionality would stay.
>
> OK, so let's keep it.  But shouldn't the below be the correct order
> according to the above quoted documentation?
>
> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el
> index f111a77663c..5db0b50adc3 100644
> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el
> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mnt.el
> @@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ lm-version
>    "Return the version listed in file FILE, or current buffer if FILE is nil.
>  This can be found in an RCS or SCCS header."
>    (lm-with-file file
> -    (or (lm-header "version")
> +    (or (lm-header "package-version")
> +        (lm-header "version")
>          (let ((header-max (lm-code-start)))
>  	  (goto-char (point-min))
>  	  (cond

Of course, that was also the change proposed in my first patch but I
didn't notice the change in Joseph's suggestion.

-- 
	Philip Kaludercic on peregrine