Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Support attr_html in source code and fixed-width blocks

[Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com>]

Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com> writes:

> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Next, if you are not interested in adding :textarea support, it is
>> OK. Adding #+ATTR_HTML support for code blocks and fixed width elements
>> will still be a welcome improvement (I was just hoping to push you to
>> contribute a bit more ;))
>>
>> Now, back to your original patch.
>> May you please factor out adding attributes into a separate function, so
>> that we avoid duplicating the code? And please announce the change in
>> the news - people aware of the current behavior might need to know about
>> the change.
>
> Given that I already have some contributions in Org mode and I don't, at
> present, intend to do the copyright assignment to FSF, ...
>
> From a feasibility perspective, I suspect it might be better for you (or
> someone else who's signed the FSF copyright assignment paperwork) to
> take on the work of applying changes that are similar in spirit to the
> patch.

I was checking up to see what the current status of this issue was when
I noticed that it doesn't show up in the "Woof!" tracker as I would
expect.  Both <https://tracker.orgmode.org/bugs?search=attr_html> and
<https://tracker.orgmode.org/requests?search=attr_html> don't yield any
results, though <https://tracker.orgmode.org/patches?search=attr_html>
does.  Are patches not allowed to be bugs or requests as well?

-- 
Suhail