From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 07:25:33 +0000 Message-ID: <87wmiu9b0y.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87wmj7dftf.fsf@posteo.net> <87setvxyt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzf7o13b.fsf@posteo.net> <87msk3jr0u.fsf@gmail.com> <87setum5do.fsf@posteo.net> <87msk1520e.fsf@gmail.com> <87settknf1.fsf@posteo.net> <87tte8akwa.fsf@gmail.com> <878qvjaep6.fsf@posteo.net> <87cykvwixn.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikukrl77.fsf@posteo.net> <871q17dasa.fsf@gmail.com> <8734lnsdcn.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13482"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: suhailsingh247@gmail.com, meedstrom@runbox.eu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tonyzorman@mailbox.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 29 09:26:44 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1suoKK-0003Mk-8a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 09:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1suoJT-0002EQ-0J; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 03:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1suoJN-0002Cx-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 03:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1suoJJ-0007oi-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 03:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27BEA240101 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 09:25:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1727594735; bh=d+sIrB78fTjt+ye4WcdywBLnkzi7/tWp/xWflKn++xQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=agqOCDcomOKAprv73PPJOaptCrJ/VDQVcJNPKEV9dSfi5Es1mxHQU9jof9xY8Ujfv mEmM+82jzQM3DnMU9qqDgFPreNpoHqHDmpME8FzJkQ+BAdOrJ+pSlD+VRn8R3LvRr5 sx6Qfo42EbKEkpO0dzLFOG69ESPVuGqF20KixC7tIUczzLDrkGwHXimtINOzXewK/D 9N4DYagg6jzW4xsLFRvFpVmLGiKbvGS2V8ELWIzNKknhauNSnhuB4s5Fcl41j+/bJ3 a/AXGEcqQfQ9V+qAPGyPa9b7+cvqfaXuj3s9wmD//7IvbtjPULtWY7fwMw/Otb3NGX tNiZhh0Zom5QQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4XGbMd5qrLz6txp; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 09:25:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2024 22:13:31 -0400") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM OpenPGP: id=philipk@posteo.net; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-email/philipk@posteo.net"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324183 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > >> The idea is to add a "COMMIT MISMATCH" warning whenever we detect that > > >> two packages have different commits. > > > > > > Which are the two packages being considered? > > > IIRC the local package you have installed, the package on NonGNU ELPA, > > the package on MELPA Stable and the package on MELPA Unstable. > > Would it be possible to describe a concrete example and state > concretely what sort of problem this would aim to detect? Suhail gave the example of julia-mode. > How do those problems arise in practice? Because of differences in how releases are marked. ELPA checks if a commit touches the "Version" header of an Elisp file, while MELPA requires a Git tag to annotate the commit used to create the tarball. -- Philip Kaludercic on siskin