From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAIL_USE_FLOCK and Debian. Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:41:28 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87vfzi1t6f.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <87lm0ijabw.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87znoxi93a.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87ptpqhqjp.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <874r7238p9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87znour3tn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045518091 17929 80.91.224.249 (17 Feb 2003 21:41:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18kt10-0004f3-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:41:30 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18ktFZ-0005xB-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:56:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kt33-0004sm-01 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:43:37 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kt2j-0004pT-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:43:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kt2h-0004kd-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from cygnus-ext.enyo.de ([212.9.189.162] helo=mail.enyo.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kt0z-0003xs-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:41:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 18kt0R-0000Fr-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:40:55 +0100 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4) id 18kt0y-0001Ka-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:41:28 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87znour3tn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:32:20 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11722 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11722 Rob Browning writes: > Sure. I actually mentioned that later down, Oops. Shouldn't do so many things in parallel. > but with that approach, there's a concern that you might upset any > constituencies that really want/need a standalone script. I don't > really have any measure of how important a concern that is, but I > have heard off and on of various uses of movemail outside emacs. I'd guess that those people would be unhappy with *any* change in movemail. Maybe you can distribute it separately, unchanged?