From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Hansen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving X selection? Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:16:55 +0200 Organization: disorganized Message-ID: <87vdxy2kwo.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> References: <20071012105022.6c8b174a@tweety> <874pgtfw1y.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> <4713067D.2060504@swipnet.se> <87fy0cdvr6.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> <471467FF.5070005@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219087439 29813 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2008 19:23:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:23:59 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 18 21:24:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KVALO-0002xq-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:24:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KVAKR-00017U-24 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KVAKL-00014b-2B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KVAKJ-00011n-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49197 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KVAKI-00011V-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:34888 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KVAKI-0007SX-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KVAKB-0007YZ-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:23:31 +0000 Original-Received: from 66.230.230.230 ([66.230.230.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:23:31 +0000 Original-Received: from david.hansen by 66.230.230.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:23:31 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.230.230.230 Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sqXR6KnG4+AqtxN9nwzd7aK6C3E= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102605 Archived-At: On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:15:25 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Please ignore this if it's already been hammered to death, but what about >> using C-Insert/Shift-Insert for the clipboard? > > That would make a lot of sense to me, Shift-Insert is kind of quasi standard to paste the *selection* on X11. This would make emacs behavior even more "non standard". I don't care much, just wanted to note that. David