From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2204: 23.0.90; minibuffer font and frame size Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:20:59 -0500 Message-ID: <87vdrlzy5w.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 2204@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234046633 10481 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2009 22:43:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2204@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Marshall\, Simon" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 23:45:07 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LVvv5-0007TS-5H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:45:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51522 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVvtl-0005jo-S0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVvtg-0005h3-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVvtf-0005fp-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33583 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVvtf-0005fi-3b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:43:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:38144) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVvte-0005RN-JU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n17MhW6H019452; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:43:32 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n17MU2EW015855; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:30:02 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2204 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2204-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2204.123404521914542 (code B ref 2204); Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2204) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Feb 2009 22:20:19 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n17MKH84014202 for <2204@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:20:18 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9824157E20B; Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:20:59 -0500 (EST) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:43:36 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25027 Archived-At: > I've always used a separate minibuffer frame with a larger font... it > correctly uses the larger font in the minibuffer, but sizes the > minibuffer frame according to the default smaller font. This may be a Motif bug---with a GTK build on GNU/Linux and the .emacs you supplied, the minibuffer frame is sized using the larger font. I don't have lots of time to work on this right now, so it would be helpful if you could experiment different build configurations, and see what makes the bug appear/disappear. Thanks.