From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:11:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87vdoou5a2.fsf@canonical.com> References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> <87mye6xnsr.fsf@xemacs.org> <87y6xpvyz6.fsf@xemacs.org> <87zli4jcc4.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ocxxrjnh.fsf@canonical.com> <874ozp4ld3.fsf@notengoamigos.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240935414 17829 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2009 16:16:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Earl , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 18:16:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LypzA-00015p-CA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:16:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lypz9-0004Nz-Nl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:16:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LypuV-0002be-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LypuV-0002am-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41665 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LypuV-0002ac-1J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:50997) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LypuU-0003ft-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1LypuR-0003LV-Fo; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:11:52 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-24-193-42-111.nyc.res.rr.com ([24.193.42.111] helo=kfogel-work) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LypuR-0006WD-Am; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:11:51 +0100 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110519 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Any news on this front? > > I think what we need now is a test Bzr repository in bzr.sv.gnu.org (so > we can test the various tools). > > From what I can tell the Bzr service is not yet activated on Savannah > for the "emacs" project, but it seems that once it's done sftp access > will work fine, whereas bzr+ssh access suffers from an old version of > Bzr on bzr.sv (when I tried it complained about an unsupported protocol > and then reconnected with an older protocol). > > Can someone contact the Savannah people to activate the Bzr service, and > then try and install Jason's latest converted repository > (http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-merges.tar.lzma). Note that this > repository uses a recent format, so it proably won't be supported by > bzr.sv's old Bzr server, so at first only sftp access will work, so we > should try and get bzr.sv's Bzr upgraded. How does this sound: When Bazaar 1.14 comes out (it's in release-candidate stage now), Jason does another repo conversion, and we ask Savannah to upgrade to the new server. We also get the latest version of Loggerhead installed (that may come automatically with Bazaar, not sure). 1.14 will include the end-of-line conversion feature. (It would be great to be able to easily test Windows development! Of course, Emacs itself handles the different EOL styles, but still...) On the one hand, I don't want infrastructure to bit-rot between when we set it up and when the project actually starts using it for real development. On the other hand, we need to test. Bazaar 1.14 seems like a good compromise point. -Karl