From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:46 -0400 Message-ID: <87vdiiof1d.fsf@canonical.com> References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> <87mye6xnsr.fsf@xemacs.org> <87y6xpvyz6.fsf@xemacs.org> <87zli4jcc4.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87d4eerm8w.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4yy7qba.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255489268 14396 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2009 03:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Clemente Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 05:00:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mxu6i-0004E2-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:00:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxu6h-000656-M5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxu6d-00064R-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxu6c-00063y-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48454 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mxu6c-00063v-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:50 -0400 Original-Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:40040) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mxu6c-0005G2-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:50 -0400 Original-Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1Mxu6a-0002JB-Rj; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:00:48 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-72-229-5-11.nyc.res.rr.com ([72.229.5.11] helo=floss) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mxu6a-0000ZP-NA; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:00:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k4yy7qba.fsf@yahoo.com> (Daniel Clemente's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:49:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116129 Archived-At: Daniel Clemente writes: > This is an old thread. Indeed. I decided to go do the responsible thing for a while and look after some bookmark.el bugs before pressing on Bzr again... but now I've done that (at least enough to salve my conscience), so: We seem to have broken down in the "test the converted repository" step -- we found problems, but we never identified why, and we were working with an old conversion anyway. As Yidong and Glenn Morris noted, at least one of the test conversions was missing some files: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-09/msg00531.html That problem might not be present in a new conversion. The most recent Bazaar switchover post seems to this one be from me: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-09/msg00624.html ...in which I ask Stefan about his method for running a commit email (or "merge email") script, and suggest using "trunk" for the master branch. Stefan? Andreas Schwab and Jason Earl have made the CVS->git->bzr conversions happen. Andreas and Jason, can we wipe the slate clean? Meaning, let's remove all previous conversions, so that no one's testing old stuff, and make a canonical new one using Bazaar 2.0. (We should all test the same thing, and that thing should be a recent thing. Savannah can handle the default format used by Bazaar 2.0, so branch browsing will be fine.) Assuming that conversion looks okay, would it be realistic for us to then freeze CVS commits while doing the real conversion, so we get a clean snapshot? I.e., how long does a conversion take? -Karl > El vie, ene 23 2009 a les 18:00, Karl Fogel va escriure: >> "Stefan Monnier" writes: >>>> (Or is filing a ticket the One True Way to enter into a dialogue with >>>> Savannah?) >>> >>> Don't know about TOTW, but I think it's a good option at least. >> >> I've filed https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?106612, and intend >> to aggregate all switchover information there. > > What's the status of the Bazaar repository? > That bug is still open.