From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mail mode vs message mode Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:53:04 -0500 Message-ID: <87vdh6focv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87639beb4n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <876399p00j.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iqd8rh73.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87r5rvvknw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lji3od0l.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258649706 3989 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2009 16:55:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17608@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 19 17:54:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBAHX-0004qz-Tb for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:54:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NBAGu-0003TJ-K7; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:54:16 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NBAGL-0003Sr-Hk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NBAGJ-0006nq-W3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0600 Original-Received: from pantheon-po24.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.118]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1NBAGJ-00038Z-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:53:39 +0100 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014244.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po24.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id nAJGr5jJ017856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74165C071; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:53:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87lji3od0l.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (Reiner Steib's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:20:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69203 gmane.emacs.devel:117261 Archived-At: Reiner Steib writes: > If the message-mode defaults aren't changed by deriving from mail-*, I > don't object. > > I'd certainly object to any change that makes message-mode less > "standard" compliant ("standards" like RFCs, GNKSA [1], good common > practice, ...). I've switched several message-mode defcustoms to the mail-* values. I've also made some changes to the mail-* defaults, so I don't think message mode users should see any change (mail mode users won't see much difference, either).