From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:10:46 +0900 Message-ID: <87vddldyw9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267118759 27756 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 17:25:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , Andreas Schwab , "emacs-devel@gnu.org discussions" To: David Reitter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 18:25:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkhTC-0006a7-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:25:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkhTB-0004NM-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkhT7-0004NH-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39107 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkhT7-0004N9-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkhT6-0003j7-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:38314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkhT6-0003i3-84 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:25:44 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7D58212; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:59:00 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE9DF4BED1; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:10:46 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121367 Archived-At: David Reitter writes: > What happens if somebody checked in code for which permission > hasn't been obtained and can't be obtained? Suppose the > copyright-holder requests removal. Then you think (and do) the unthinkable, of course. It would be very good luck if that's all they want, though -- that scenario involves much bigger problems.