From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next emacs version? Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:42:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87vdcrhd55.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <56D10E2523764AC98D99CEBC55DBAD93@us.oracle.com> <83iq8sigyq.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3z0i3nu.fsf@gnu.org> <911BA1D06CEB4306924D0069BA2D3DFF@us.oracle.com> <83bpeki18a.fsf@gnu.org> <83aau4hv38.fsf@gnu.org> <0E10B96B5C814EE8B95B57972F13E189@us.oracle.com> <5E984B3C-4B86-4FA6-8675-4C8501CC2285@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269056594 6749 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2010 03:43:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:43:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 04:43:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nspag-0006Jm-Iw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:43:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60212 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nspaf-0006z9-VD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nspab-0006yb-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43379 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nspaa-0006xz-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NspaY-0006vT-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NspaX-0006vD-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NspaT-0006HG-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:42:57 +0100 Original-Received: from 81.34.30.46 ([81.34.30.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:42:57 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 81.34.30.46 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:42:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.34.30.46 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GIo5q0ZwSaXcfpUvFa39OqD7vw4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122336 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: >> Unless you want to start putting bzr revision numbers into the emacs >> version string (which I think is a bad idea), that's going to be the >> case. > > But perhaps having the bzr version available in another variable in > the build Emacs would be a good idea? It would be useful to include bzr's revision id (not revision number) along the info sent by M-x report-emacs-bug.