From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Efforts to attract more users? Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:03:59 +0530 Message-ID: <87vd8od8rs.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4C37108C.3040207@siege-engine.com> <87y6dkoncz.fsf@aott.dev.webwasher.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278686069 24107 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2010 14:34:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fplemma@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alex Ott , "Eric M. Ludlam" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 09 16:34:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXEep-0003U0-4F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:34:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXEeo-0005Pt-Bf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52642 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXEei-0005P6-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXEec-0001GZ-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.9]:45522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXEec-0001Fl-45; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by e28smtp09.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o69EVAHH024315; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:01:10 +0530 Original-Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o69EY7Rb3031146; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:04:08 +0530 Original-Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o69EY783003761; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:34:07 +1000 Original-Received: from skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com ([9.124.211.157]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o69EXxl3003609; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:34:03 +1000 In-Reply-To: <87y6dkoncz.fsf@aott.dev.webwasher.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126952 Archived-At: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:23:24 +0200, Alex Ott wrote: > Re > > Eric M. Ludlam at "Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:05:32 -0400" wrote: > EML> On 07/08/2010 11:05 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > >> The Eclipse IDE has some nice features. Maybe CEDET gives us some of > >> them, but maybe we still lack some. > > EML> In some ways CEDET is "better" that Eclipse (code completion in C/C++ is better), and in > EML> others it falls behind, such as project management. (This I gather from comments I've > EML> read). > > The biggest problem with CEDET is speed, This is one of the main issue i also have. I would really like some of the CEDET related operation pushed to background and make it don't effect my editing task. But otherwise I am really happy with the feature provided. -aneesh