From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Guile vs ELisp Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:17:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87vd4dhxlv.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87sjzhm74b.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288887607 18340 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2010 16:20:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:20:07 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 17:20:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE2Xg-00068T-R0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:20:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PE2Xf-0003lr-S9 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35975 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PE2Vb-0002fb-Vb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:17:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PE2Va-00029m-Qv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PE2Va-00029V-LM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE2VY-0004sW-5g for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:17:48 +0100 Original-Received: from tsdh.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.67.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:17:48 +0100 Original-Received: from tassilo by tsdh.uni-koblenz.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:17:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: tsdh.uni-koblenz.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zi3WK4KGqtWPVp3LXNefQtkqkYQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:75292 Archived-At: Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () Dani Moncayo > () Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:11:28 +0100 > > If GNU Emacs was to be started from scratch > today, would Guile be better than ELips as > extensibility language? > > That is a good question! There was some talk on emacs-devel about implementing elisp in Guile, so that elisp runs in the Guile VM and uses its garbage collection, its FFI and all other nice things. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-04/msg00665.html Bye, Tassilo