From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:17:48 -0500 Message-ID: <87vd12z77n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87oc6vm67v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296667260 28365 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 17:21:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tim Cross Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 18:20:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkgNy-00048N-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:20:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39147 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkgNx-0007Mb-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:20:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50371 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkgL2-00063Q-Em for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkgL1-0003jT-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:17:52 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]:36669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkgL1-0003jP-8o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:17:51 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014242.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p12HHnrY001416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:17:49 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 163EF16058F; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:17:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Tim Cross's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:02:00 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135469 Archived-At: Tim Cross writes: > My only concern is how you define what to inherit from. For example, > in your suggestion of compiler warnings inheriting form > =C2=A0font-lock-comment-face I immediately wondered why you would not > inherit from font-lock-warning face? font-lock-warning-face is already used for compilation errors, which are more serious than warnings.