From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: can Gnus simply use the Emacs bug tracker? Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:58:42 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vczjukel.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8762rk2vah.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6iy64gxk4z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lj0gyxld.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hbzxj11.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300292100 23221 80.91.229.12 (16 Mar 2011 16:15:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 16 17:14:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PztN3-00081t-5t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:14:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48067 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pzt80-00039n-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55279 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pzt7o-00037T-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzt7j-0006Sm-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzt7i-0006SH-Sq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzt7h-0001KC-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:58:57 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:58:57 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:58:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:PgvO4ETLr4JRgJCJSS0/kZwIrJ0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137292 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77834 Archived-At: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:44 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> There was a point where Gnus was merged into Emacs. Do we want that to >>>> be the separation point? Or do we want all non-trunk reports to go to >>>> Gnus only? I'm not sure. GM> IMO, if someone is using the version of Gnus that came with their Emacs, GM> they should send bug reports to bug-gnu-emacs. If not, ie if they GM> downloaded a separate version of Gnus, then to bugs@gnus. >> Oh, that makes perfect sense. So in the Gnus trunk we'll set >> `M-x gnus-bug' to send to bugs@gnus.org and insert "Package: gnus". But >> in the Emacs trunk the same command will send to bug-gnu-emacs and >> insert "Package: emacs,gnus". Is that correct? SM> Sounds fine to me. SM> I'm also OK with sending ll to bug-gnu-emacs (and maybe distinguishing SM> the two by using either "gnus" or "emacs,gnus" as package). Glenn, is Stefan's suggestion easier to implement (I would guess so)? I'm OK with either approach as well. Ted