From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: org-clock-report to insert a :scope sutree report when called
 from within a subtree?
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:16:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87vcz9gbww.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <874o72koig.fsf@altern.org>
	<AANLkTi=tOi2Z20xLd6tyodvWa04OJ4VJwO32qRhYK_C=@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56765 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2OrU-0002qx-Fp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:16:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Q2OrT-0005kd-AX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:16:36 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:36348)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Q2OrT-0005kS-52
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:16:35 -0400
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so8833421wyf.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=tOi2Z20xLd6tyodvWa04OJ4VJwO32qRhYK_C=@mail.gmail.com>
	(John Hendy's message of "Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:26:43 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi John,

John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:

> It probably depends on the number of people using huge files vs.
> those not. Or the number of people who want this vs. those that
> don't. Actually, I don't think it really matters because it's so easy
> to change it anyway. Once it's created and changed a little, I often
> don't change it again.
>
> Personally, my org-mode usage favors "bite-sized" files that get
> replaced over time rather than keeping huge files. My files cover one
> month and that's it. Then they are filed away. For me... :scope file
> isn't a big deal.

thanks for your feedback -- I've applied the patch.  I also think it's
quite easy to configure, and avoiding possibly long clock reports by
default is a good thing IMHO.

Best,

-- 
 Bastien