From: Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org>
To: 9113@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, Roland Winkler <winkler@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:50:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcnuon1c.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878vkt3yiv.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:23:20 -0600")
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> I think we'll need something on top of EPA/EPG if we support OpenPGP
> packets with libnettle,
I don't think it is a good idea to expose full cryptographic functions
in libnettle into Elisp, simply because there is no real use-case for
them except auth-source.
If you really want them and you think your problem can only be solved
with that approach, I would rather suggest to add gpg-encrypt-simple and
gpg-decrypt-simple in C level, which generates OpenPGP packets but only
supports single fixed algorithm and parameters.
So, anyway, this topic is not quite relevant to EPA/EPG from my
standpoint.
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-29 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 3:08 bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg Roland Winkler
2012-01-25 20:18 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-26 2:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-01-26 15:32 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-26 17:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-01-26 17:52 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-26 17:53 ` Achim Gratz
2012-01-26 20:01 ` bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg, bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg, " Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-26 21:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-01-30 16:36 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-30 22:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-01-30 22:21 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-31 9:00 ` Michael Albinus
2012-01-31 17:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-02-13 17:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-13 18:35 ` Michael Albinus
2012-01-27 1:47 ` bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg, bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg, " Daiki Ueno
2012-01-27 16:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-29 9:50 ` Daiki Ueno [this message]
2012-01-30 16:33 ` bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg, bug#9113: 24.0.50; auth-sources: .authinfo versus .authinfo.gpg, " Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-31 6:55 ` Chong Yidong
2012-01-31 11:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-03 17:14 ` Kevin Rodgers
2012-01-31 11:11 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-31 11:37 ` Michael Albinus
2012-02-13 17:38 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-28 8:47 ` Roland Winkler
2012-01-28 19:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-28 19:32 ` Roland Winkler
2012-01-30 16:18 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-30 18:49 ` Roland Winkler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vcnuon1c.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org \
--to=ueno@unixuser.org \
--cc=9113@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=Stromeko@nexgo.de \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=winkler@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.