From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.auctex.devel,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finally bringing AUCTeX into Gnu Emacs Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:50:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcnizzmi.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> References: Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328611834 14339 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 10:50:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, emacs To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Fenn Original-X-From: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 11:50:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruid6-0002df-MC for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:50:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52130 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruid5-0000CT-OF for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:50:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruicz-0000C4-6n for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruict-0007LA-Ft for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:36665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruict-0007L0-AG; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:50:19 -0500 Original-Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so6763394wib.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:50:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:x-mailer:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:x-hashcash :x-hashcash:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CLkO7pkKqKuBufI++iwOrlbdNM03Kk0fq/4L2Dqis+E=; b=cDu8wjpW/KuECQRF6dA7yiPQKQAaeKu/VXITIZNAAV1cvXAUt73//+1efBaUoRhn/3 JfvHCgmzxAyA/5aM3iQlUA7+etDyqPei5SE36Flk7o0/q/Aa2GYYVjaSs3eRNpT4yzyJ ytTaAPgLRQ1jy1LRE1Gh4XEKqRRLSL7lFx7YY= Original-Received: by 10.180.81.35 with SMTP id w3mr33120544wix.10.1328611817772; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:50:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es (gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es. [147.96.12.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g6sm50433891wig.9.2012.02.07.02.50.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:50:16 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:120207:schneeschmelze@googlemail.com::TYYFsd90WqPMGIxK:00000000000000000000000000000000B0y+ X-Hashcash: 1:20:120207:auctex-devel@gnu.org::WW0bq8Ks7IG3WgL9:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000Dy+Q User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.5-b31 (linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.212.169 X-BeenThere: auctex-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AUCTeX developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.auctex.devel:2691 gmane.emacs.devel:148297 Archived-At: >> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:44 +0100, J=FCrgen Fenn wrote: > I would like to draw your attention to this discussion on emacs-devel > on whether AUCTeX could finally be included in GNU Emacs. I would > appreciate if you please could take part in the discussion. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-01/msg00847.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-02/msg00004.html Thanks for your email. As the pkg manager of Auctex for Xemacs let me ask: would that imply/mean/ that Xemacs would not be supported in the future? Uwe Brauer =