From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexical-binding questions Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 08:00:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87vck9vog8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336284035 28098 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2012 06:00:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 06:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 06 08:00:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQuWI-0002Jz-P5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 08:00:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQuWH-0003f4-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:00:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46707) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQuWF-0003en-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:00:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQuWD-0006q7-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:34338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQuWD-0006pv-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so2267886wer.0 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 23:00:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=0bVvTWBUzIVQNx9f+SQra905SsQRtJ07u1rw7OS2Kdk=; b=Dp2bkTCi3Roz0wV2qO+DqmuqQtrJiHgAkLZJYDmaMsNSC7By426cAXs9/gB9cu/mZq NxE0B0vdgSjVgTQRn8DjBgCTj1IA6ztfGliidGgQaEZ9HBOPm86BqkH5g8UOHDZO5IfS ARSj6bJpUqHwZvrYbMGKFMXcnSwzMKGp42lXV/X+nvyKpFkfV/0YTp19sXjhOxG/7MBD L7EqrnXErQuklh7dhc7CQbjRg3IE8WLoUe7LDl03SDvXWCtUczi5yNbLHcJhmaBmTx2U aAE+S9ClbeGS2uArv+bFLhgAD3weE+SN6Si6WQgnbdtLEJqSbE9SGJHafgKh+8iMNv8d 8Fzg== Original-Received: by 10.216.150.225 with SMTP id z75mr7253344wej.77.1336284027419; Sat, 05 May 2012 23:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from thierry-MM061 (lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net. [78.243.104.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm1sm10817790wib.10.2012.05.05.23.00.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 May 2012 23:00:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 05 May 2012 09:29:39 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150317 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Because it forces the interpreter to check for the presence of > a `declare' every time it sees a `let', even though it will only find > one once per century or so. Maybe not now we have lexical-binding, the use of `declare' would become more common. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997