From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11454: 24.1.50; `list-buffers-refresh', `Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width' Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:32:23 +0800 Message-ID: <87vck19afc.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336804383 29848 80.91.229.3 (12 May 2012 06:33:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 06:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11454@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 12 08:33:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5sz-0003yL-Az for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:33:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5sy-0004S9-GJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59041) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5sv-0004Ry-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5ss-0002fS-VN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5ss-0002fN-Ry for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:32:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5t0-0005PR-MB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:33:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 06:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11454 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11454-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11454.133680438120785 (code B ref 11454); Sat, 12 May 2012 06:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11454) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2012 06:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5sy-0005PB-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42152 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5se-0005Ol-Gd for 11454@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:32:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [155.69.195.200] (port=41160 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5sS-0008GT-QC; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:32:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 11 May 2012 13:06:57 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59953 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > (let ((name-width Buffer-menu-name-width) > (size-width Buffer-menu-size-width)) > ;; Handle obsolete variable: > (if Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width > (setq name-width (- Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width size-width))) > > The code calculates NAME-WIDTH based on a user's customized > `Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width', but it does not similarly calculate > SIZE-WIDTH. > > It simply ignores the user's customization and uses the > default value of the new option `Buffer-menu-size-width'. > Not very user-friendly, eh? What would you suggest: ignoring Buffer-menu-buffer+size-width if both Buffer-menu-name-width and Buffer-menu-size-width are specified (i.e. ignoring it by default)?