From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:22:48 +0800 Message-ID: <87vchosavb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <500039B7.8050106@cs.ucla.edu> <87629p9jdm.fsf@gnu.org> <5002F283.2060206@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342405395 6400 80.91.229.3 (16 Jul 2012 02:23:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 16 04:23:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqaxu-000464-Id for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:23:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60845 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqaxt-0005f0-K1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqaxr-0005ev-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqaxq-0004XI-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqaxq-0004XE-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqb3W-0004vL-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11935.134240573018905 (code B ref 11935); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2012 02:28:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqb3J-0004ur-Jv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqb3H-0004uk-TL for 11935@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:35359 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqaxa-0007wK-OT; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:22:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5002F283.2060206@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:40:35 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61976 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > I wasn't planning to install it into the emacs-24 branch; only the > trunk. Is 24.2 going to come from the emacs-24 branch? No, from the trunk. I've explained this several times on emacs-devel, but maybe you missed those messages. The emacs-24 branch is only in case of emergency (e.g. security) release. Otherwise, 24.2 will be from the trunk; it will include new features, i.e. it won't be a bugfix-only release. But this change could be rather disruptive, for apparently negligible gain, so better leave it out, I think. > And if not, then where should post-24 changes go? You can make a new branch, if you like, or just keep this as a bug in the BTS.