From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12107: 24.1.50; In Info mode, add the name of the manual as completion candidate for "bookmark-set" Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:03:06 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87vch190ph.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87ipd38tc7.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87vch3xbf4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87obmudymn.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343895403 25512 80.91.229.3 (2 Aug 2012 08:16:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12107@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 02 10:16:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqaI-0008Tr-Gy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:16:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52595 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqaH-0004cw-PW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:16:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqaE-0004co-C5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swqa8-0000Up-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swqa8-0000Ul-Ju for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqhN-0003Hn-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12107.134389583112615 (code B ref 12107); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2012 08:23:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqhD-0003HQ-8q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:23:51 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:48176 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SwqhA-0003HI-HU for 12107@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 04:23:49 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B68451CB52; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:10:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62745 Archived-At: > Is there a good reason why we can't use a list in (car record) and avoid > using a new `defaults' field? Using a list in (car record) means changing the format of the bookmark record that will require adding special casing in other packages that use it. OTOH, adding a new `defaults' field is harmless and doesn't change the format. > If so, please add a comment explaining it. Will do.