From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:52:48 +0530 Message-ID: <87vc5345t3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51C6B138.50903@gmx.at> <51C6CF57.9030203@alice.it> <51C87C3E.90904@gmx.at> <83ehbrju1d.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4frcq9v.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372105305 22024 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2013 20:21:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , Eli Zaretskii , Stephen Berman , Emacs developers , Angelo Graziosi To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 24 22:21:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrDGj-0002KU-40 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:21:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrDGi-0007l7-MQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:21:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35259) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrDGY-0007W1-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:21:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrDGX-0008RZ-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]:53353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrDGX-0008RV-PT; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:21:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id um15so11467616pbc.10 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:21:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=tzQpN61r1YGj2BKcPVPuKZJSe/nP0nt40GVz5a1rkFI=; b=TthJXBMZ+6srgXMpg+fJSpFVHJGYaTv9VGfPrUcW20STlrTVTtMBPsz7i3m+7guONg ENML1MQDmqkDHzRooARl4r54XMyR3cqExer+cImrht24HwdSZfnrtlX/nlOYTKIpPGiJ HI6YMvI1EsAnW8mCw5XW3BRLOwgxamMjU2WxUf3aiacy7ypfJ0OeTo/z/x4ShWeJ7fSf h6ENQF2xdPzSrPQ0jN2VgvdBghgsJ4vV6WJjvlCGiBhdevJtl8G7zbF1WVTjZfvW4zN+ 0lzOGfdKO7iTp+xFxucd0cSMmWdwMQcndW+AYJvx0oRGIx419c0H40FJkhANgAWMTSSr OgEg== X-Received: by 10.68.88.129 with SMTP id bg1mr25003138pbb.10.1372105292913; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.63.145.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ka16sm21394301pad.14.2013.06.24.13.21.28 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:21:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:10:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160984 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Stephen Berman wrote: > >> A more idiomatic, though to my ear still stilted, phasing would be: >> >> Parameters not saved by `current-window-configuration' or >> `window-state-get' are respectively left alone by >> `set-window-configuration' or not installed by `window-state-put'. > > To my Spaniard's ears it would seem better > > Parameters not saved by `current-window-configuration' and > `window-state-get' are not restored by `set-window-configuration' > and `window-state-put', respectively. > > but I'm not sure how idiomatic that is. I see two "nots". Avoid two negatives. The only parameter that is restored by ... are those that are saved with ... Another variation would be Parameters that are restored by ... must be saved with a prior call to ... You get the drift...