From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:17:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87vby1a0hf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20140102095347.6834E381D0C@snark.thyrsus.com> <87fvp6bdd9.fsf_-_@ktab.red-bean.com> <8761q1ljny.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhyxqztz.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388740659 29423 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2014 09:17:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Thierry Volpiatto To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 03 10:17:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz0sy-0005WD-4P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:17:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz0sx-0001eD-Jn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:17:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz0sm-0001dR-9P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:17:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz0sK-0004vf-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:41470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz0sK-0004vN-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm19so239792wib.7 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:17:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=v+PdBsAp469/aBAVFzWDtq9xpB5heiqYXnUBlsBZ4ag=; b=Hr06aH+7uC/x4Ynbgjh1Q+bp8LB1fQNO922jSMOSKoGme2TC0t/k5omSHJb/TbW3Hp WJPkVoO0azXWhvWMnOTWGK9uSTGN9mSBdIhkLs3mz0/Ja1fgfXMLYyR0UND0fSiUFIp7 Fu2P6oqgKNwlGZsaPw21KLX9ZYp0r3HDsEJi1jhlnohekCkByv7TH0CSzAIsjuFBJv7n s40JTZNVgYgh0GjDigXdYxVFVdfkrghw9Fb198dZgvs//1nzKWzlH+ewoNIDyf1yTZ0Q NHsuXCzKdLC9GJRVEmm2u3F3Ni8R0hGXA4I3eFDZMR730WlsXezY0cNlm9VjqqiqssS5 0c2A== X-Received: by 10.194.63.228 with SMTP id j4mr61035564wjs.34.1388740623855; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:17:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain ([78.250.218.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ly8sm20908700wjb.17.2014.01.03.01.17.01 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:17:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A6F11C20632; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:17:00 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87lhyxqztz.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:39:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167127 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > They are useful. A tar distribution does not contain the git repo with > the history of commitments. +1. > Another question is, whether we still want to write ChangeLogs manually, > or whether we want to extract them from commit comments. That's not such > easy, see all the "fix typo" comments. I'm all for writing them manually, it's a useful exercise. IMHO git commit messages should reproduce ChangeLogs, not the other way around. -- Bastien