From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kelvin White <kwhite@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: ERC versioning
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:11 -0400
Message-ID: <87vbplof9c.wl%kwhite@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408646612 9552 80.91.229.3 (21 Aug 2014 18:43:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 21 20:43:25 2014
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1XKXKW-0003jd-TH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:43:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33679 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1XKXKW-0002nh-Hp
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:24 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37606)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwhite@gnu.org>) id 1XKXKT-0002n1-LN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:22 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwhite@gnu.org>) id 1XKXKS-0004u6-9J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:21 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36458)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwhite@gnu.org>) id 1XKXKS-0004u2-5o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe73:3fa6] (port=52659
	helo=localhost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kwhite@gnu.org>) id 1XKXKR-0002nF-UB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:43:20 -0400
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
	FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
	(bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173788
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/173788>


Is there any reason not to drop ERC version now that
it isn't maintained seperately from Emacs? So, instead of ...
"ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)" 
it would be "ERC (IRC client for Emacs 24.4)" etc.

Otherwise it will always be version 5.3 but part of Emacs release
cycle. Any thoughts?