From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19111: 25.0.50; 32 bits temacs.exe is linked with wrong image-base when built on 64 bit Windows host Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:11:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbm7nuc4.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87fvdfrl4p.fsf@telefonica.net> <83k32q7wkl.fsf@gnu.org> <87bno2swxp.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83egsy7d2x.fsf@gnu.org> <87siheqzq9.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83389d7t89.fsf@gnu.org> <87a93lrgct.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83mw7l6bjc.fsf@gnu.org> <87389dragi.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83egsx60um.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4r5pgae.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ioi8pg84.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87egswpf9p.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87a93kp3lb.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416669161 28999 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2014 15:12:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19111@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 22 16:12:34 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCMS-0000V7-KX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:12:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCMS-00029i-5p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCMC-0001ua-4E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCLz-0000Ze-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCLy-0000Za-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCLy-0005eA-Oz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19111 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19111-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19111.141666910421672 (code B ref 19111); Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19111) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2014 15:11:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCLg-0005dU-9h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:11:44 -0500 Original-Received: from relaycp02.dominioabsoluto.net ([217.116.26.74]:42981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XsCLd-0005dJ-SP for 19111@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:11:43 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.movistar.es (smtp10.acens.net [86.109.99.134]) by relaycp02.dominioabsoluto.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F19D25EA; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:49:03 +0100 (CET) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020D.5470A7AC.00FA, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Original-Received: from qcore (79.158.48.132) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 5453978C00B25B4C; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:11:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sat, 22 Nov 2014 09:46:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96420 Archived-At: Dani Moncayo writes: > Things that I find extrange, FWIW: > > 1. The check for the compiler's target goes before the check for gcc. > But the former might need to ivoke the compiler (as in my case). So > aparently the order of these checks should be swapped. That's intentional, to not scatter mingw special cases even further and to have $canonical fixed on the spot where it is introduced, avoiding the risk of intermediate uses. > 2. If I'm cross compiling, why the last check above says the contrary? As Eli says. Thanks for testing.