From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: default large-file-warning-threshold Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:33:55 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87vblvjk30.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <21606.10799.112099.788101@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1753218.Ot8JCqssfN@descartes> <546AABCF.8030705@cs.ucla.edu> <9xioico2nm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k32s9zm5.fsf@gnu.org> <547A4A1B.9060807@cs.ucla.edu> <20141130101201.3a2625e6@forcix> <547B4285.8070901@cs.ucla.edu> <83wq6c8s47.fsf@gnu.org> <547B9127.2080508@cs.ucla.edu> <878uismg2o.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87h9xfnvur.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box> <83tx1f6ypd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417458873 22785 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2014 18:34:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:34:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 01 19:34:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVnl-0005dT-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:34:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33185 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVnk-0007zN-N5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVne-0007zI-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVnY-0005fB-Vs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVnY-0005ew-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvVnS-0005Tz-B5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:34:06 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f51fe3.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.245.31.227]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:34:06 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f51fe3.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:34:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f51fe3.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5u1+eHDZv1Ge4V6MDIRyHQ4aaTQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178620 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Achim Gratz >> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:06:04 +0100 >> >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> > If a mode is so slow that visiting a big file is problematic, then that >> > sounds like a bug in that mode, I think. >> >> Try fundamental mode with a line length of around 1MB some time, with >> lines truncated at the window border, then. And no, this isn't anything >> spectactularly outrageous, just a CSV export of some tabulated data with >> 5000 columns. > > A.k.a. bug #13675. Does it help to do (setq-default bidi-paragraph-direction nil) ? -- David Kastrup