From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Carlos Pita Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19691: 24.4; python.el: indentation RFE Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:25:18 -0300 Message-ID: <87vbjt4o1d.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422282382 22835 80.91.229.3 (26 Jan 2015 14:26:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: galli.87@gmail.com To: 19691@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 15:26:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkcK-0008Un-95 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:26:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkcJ-00008z-EL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkcC-00008q-Jn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkc8-0004OF-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkc8-0004O8-GP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkc7-0004ms-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:26:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Carlos Pita Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:26:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 19691 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.142228234318373 (code B ref -1); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:26:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2015 14:25:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkbm-0004mH-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkbh-0004lw-89 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkba-0004JQ-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:31 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkba-0004JM-SM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkbZ-00006R-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkbU-0004Ip-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]:39633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YFkbU-0004Ii-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:25:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bm13so6877119qab.0 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:25:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=aZlREg+LLiU0RXwXwWKFj/tbmXs22gVlgxEjh7wM1Nc=; b=F+7PNgFY2H6p57UvZRgw6MEXQbf44r+42nN+SqR8GZZZQlr7cAVDp4alSKRlQEczBG axrRs2IORs8ECu1haaTfwVXz+6hhpLqwmXK2pdy8dBheVRf0rN+FCA/o2i20IxdnRlxF wZS8Yf699KN+mLZXmO9WwO6Oc2xs3ST0aF/zXcSglu63RM4BVTWjDACzxxMGtfYRIRGX mw1g/FEzTahL6Id6OkqPpLMerJyVlJKcSSyZCq6hnIVX4Q93/QhiuqFecgbhA+lYTF44 7HCVuhZS/BUztRfuXHTnAyJwVa9Xx7x6jPWuBFEpI32qkvjK8xorNwMOURl+t59IqPff u7Bg== X-Received: by 10.224.11.5 with SMTP id r5mr7277704qar.67.1422282323029; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:25:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from carlos-jampp ([190.18.155.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p38sm10039017qgd.31.2015.01.26.06.25.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:25:22 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98757 Archived-At: When you're in a blank line and press Enter, IMHO it would be better if python.el kept the cursor column position, instead of restoring the last non-blank line indentation level. For example, say the cursor is X: def f(): pass X When I press Enter most often I don't want to get: def f(): pass X Instead, I think a more sensible default behaviour would be: def f(): pass X That is, to keep the cursor vertical position. This is consistent with the criterion of auto-indenting up to the indentation of last (both blank or non-blank) line, except for the technicality that a blank last line is not really indented... although you still have a point position there to infer desired indentation for the new line. Maybe this should be made a customizable option. What do you think? I'll try to submit a patch later today.