From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19791: 25.0.50; Bad HTML rendering Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:50:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87vbjedjoz.fsf@violet.siamics.net> References: <87386ifb0x.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87wq3ub2u9.fsf@ahungry.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423309884 5811 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2015 11:51:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:51:24 +0000 (UTC) To: 19791@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 12:51:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3ux-0006Iu-3P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:51:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3uw-0000zv-IR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3un-0000mo-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:51:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3ui-0002EA-IO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3ug-0002Dt-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:51:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3ug-0006Is-2c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19791 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19791-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19791.142330985224214 (code B ref 19791); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19791) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2015 11:50:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3uW-0006IU-97 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:50:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:42799) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3uT-0006IH-05 for 19791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:50:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=/TdsFllKBhWOu8Op7W7vmBEL0nLP7+TN0oTXXegklnU=; b=Qvf6MZcFqAVuYMGJ5s/3k4nTTvL1XSRoaUUSml3nTeg6n3xeIT7mqtzjHXrWWOXpyDu8zFMUhI7NHS2eknuoib11HYinIzxEyDiA/DaNyi+xSek248ANXlhwBgxDxCI3yz8aJHc3fb1+1NiDjdIgLGCgGv1AYLUHdgFpBKMgzFk=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3uO-0008Sw-JN for 19791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:50:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3uH-0005yV-DD for 19791@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 18:50:37 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: 19791@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87wq3ub2u9.fsf@ahungry.com> (Matthew Carter's message of "Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:25:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99127 Archived-At: >>>>> Matthew Carter writes: >>>>> Ivan Shmakov writes: [=E2=80=A6] >> That being said, being myself a user of EWW on a 16-color Linux tty, >> I don=E2=80=99t see much value in trying to render HTML-specified color= s, >> anyway. I=E2=80=99ve just disabled the feature over a year ago, =E2=80= =93 and never >> wanted it back. [=E2=80=A6] > Is there a way to disable background colors while leaving font colors > in-tact? Not any I=E2=80=99m aware of. Anyway, SHR currently only supports =E2=80=9Cdirect=E2=80=9D styling (for instance, it will colorize , but /not/ , =E2=80=93 even when the applicable CSS has =E2=80=98.binomen { color: #080; }=E2=80=99), so SHR support for colors is= to be taken with a grain of salt. (And there=E2=80=99s a similar issue with multicolumn layouts, BTW.) > I hate having the background colored (either the full screen or > behind text), but a little color on the words is nice in my opinion > (I use a 256 color tty). Note that even when the support for colors proper is disabled, SHR will still use the shr-link, bold and italic faces for the contents of the respective HTML elements, as defined by the hard-coded mapping (yes, no CSS support there yet, either.) IMO, this gives just that little color on the words which is reasonable. --=20 FSF associate member #7257 np. Dust to Dust =E2=80=94 Leviathan 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A