From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: member returns list Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 02:25:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbbji0in.fsf@debian.uxu> References: <87egicl0y1.fsf@debian.uxu> <87twr4e513.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441845055 7286 80.91.229.3 (10 Sep 2015 00:30:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:30:55 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 02:30:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZpl1-0001oc-PV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 02:30:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZpl1-0003wp-0T for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:30:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZpkn-0003we-E9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZpkk-0006fy-84 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZpkk-0006fu-25 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZpkZ-0001LE-PE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 02:30:03 +0200 Original-Received: from nl106-137-244.student.uu.se ([130.243.137.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 02:30:03 +0200 Original-Received: from embe8573 by nl106-137-244.student.uu.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 02:30:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nl106-137-244.student.uu.se Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:a1Rx3Qc3Mwbe1vDWO6Zsye+6j1Y= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:107107 Archived-At: Robert Thorpe writes: > I think the Common Lisp vs Emacs Lisp debate is > fighting the last war. > > In the past Common Lisp was the only major lisp. > Lispers had to use that and learn it. Using Emacs > was natural and if a Lisper did then that meant > learning Emacs Lisp too. An obvious solution to this > was to standardize on Common Lisp for Emacs too. > > Now though there's Clojure. By the looks of things > most new Lisp development is going to be done with > Clojure not Common Lisp. There's also Racket, and > I expect quite a bit will be done with that. So, > switching Emacs to Common Lisp won't help much. There is a lot of Lisps going on. Just browse comp.lang.lisp and see. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573