Re: [RFC] Draft mode

[Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>]

Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:

> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
>> On Thursday,  8 Oct 2015 at 19:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I think I will go with the straight to the point
>>> `org-export-barf-on-invalid-link' variable.
>>>
>>> However, not sure about the OPTIONS item.
>>>
>>>   #+OPTIONS: ???:t
>>
>> #+options: barf:t
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> More seriously, I'm a big fan of longer is better if more clear so how
>> about "invalidlinksok:t" or "allowdanglinglinks:t" or some variation
>> thereof?
>
> Can option names contain dashes?
> If so, combine these two ideas to make a name as similar as possible
> to the variable name:
>
> #+options: barf-on-invalid-link:t

While I agree that options such as 't:·', '^:·', 'h:·' are bad, I think
'barf:·' is nice.  It's short and precise, much like 'num:·'.

Something like 'barf-on-invalid-link' is very easy to mistype or forget.
And yes, I mostly type options by hand.

Rasmus

-- 
Got mashed potatoes. Ain't got no T-Bone. No T-Bone