From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recursive load? master build fail Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 09:23:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87vb2nzodk.fsf@gmx.de> References: <52a1bc0e-762b-fbdc-8866-b03ef491b2ae@yandex.ru> <572E8365.9090803@cs.ucla.edu> <572E9CCB.7070401@cs.ucla.edu> <572EE7F4.4060100@cs.ucla.edu> <87twi9q8za.fsf@gmx.de> <87k2j4ri98.fsf@gmx.de> <572F8FE0.7080600@cs.ucla.edu> <8760uo19yp.fsf@gmx.de> <57303185.5010705@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462778657 5561 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2016 07:24:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 07:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Emacs developers , Kaushal Modi To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 09:24:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1azfXx-0008D4-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 09:24:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azfXw-00038q-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 03:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azfXN-00027I-20 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 03:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azfXJ-0005KZ-Pr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 03:23:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azfXJ-0005K5-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 03:23:25 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.55.182]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6Ana-1bozcx1oGw-00yA4c; Mon, 09 May 2016 09:23:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <57303185.5010705@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 8 May 2016 23:43:17 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:DxorcD96sfgWIOAYDENdTxYn2PGLIWoCsQpQufaSNljMbA4a3Ha 3oVJX+BIOH8MzWDpwrEg+3DY/L/6fVOILDPgIhy0dFBGd4XY01pGXJwCeFU64+u0Z1fiVGO QM+4T8tuP/V0vUftr55caAiO/QjsQKGMF5mYXoHot3mU8SyjpTUMMlx2bJXSergVwDTB5m/ 72m8G7ElX87J2dtwJ3jIg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:KsviSBRpHcA=:i+oZ2l9aIHpd9RlhF6eKse 6K0pgSkjz/wDVvq4l0kjvuOYGHEolXp/aUWSdLYvu77GrHEFSOQ6eFJffXdx5QhOe/8J9rAiJ kXb+/VY9x3p4mw5NqrnSTlhlIJ2sxthT5wjAzFYds7jHdZSFFMKnAmtRPkC8q9hdbvP/L/7hj yCAVoVY/kxZl1e53A2RITy/T0wNdEnihV0hkMcwVZ3wktlUzYMc0EQlwOvj8mcOZm4qVEYHcy wymgkOcAXSbIJiCr2TPWc1TKq8PwhcXKFqrExNjvj4g7QYpeDThD1BwU+Eh0O7QY3N/Q3knsP MjIpPZbLI9frMXiG5Uh1XY/xx3Oax7KdbC9ueuoTgqrBZxiAqc087JpkHJuRTwocVZHqZzikE tqZu4jiGtWN4oLJcY9xrnxz52X05pR4fjmqsBAzTlyFbE5YBiE8ShntdALL6nRVsSFBeVwzSf Nv38v5Li2YMf+9+jhKCNk3nnXqVkYNUdMXOBm+a1DDceabgSnThsF9oLiE7shn/feQb82ktN2 6Rgl1hE2S/58it67k347asqVjf8PldWkWdnQbnIGuKUls5rUTHjulnfliVr28vvGeY/OEoJTI RkKjve98UFtVq8D5phOPlPNWEYa6AAI+B3OyBaJa5IKN8ReT/ZbUw/o434V5w7lYAnjKNSPif lBR48VlofJwvEPX16rTuLKQxqve7cHdy8Yp2x2/4fJlba/tCv6Q3Do8HcKkDe9D07xRuqmZGr zjs82XAa3bZsq++XecrSEwnnmkf9JCycKaV8mgeMGen12B7YhpEQcNtw2MWg1ebNsPz6u0SZ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203702 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: >> Do you use another remote >> directory for testing but the default `/mock::/tmp/'? > > I just run "make check" without any special settings. I assume no remote > directories are involved. Yes, only the mock default for tests. I've committed a patch which ought to solve the problem for you. Since it doesn't happen for me, could you, pls check? Best regards, Michael.