From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23738: [feature request] eww allow multiple buffer Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:16:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87vat1vg8t.fsf@gnus.org> References: <575A79D9.9080200@easy-emacs.de> <87wpdkkudx.fsf@gnus.org> <877f5kgk20.fsf@udel.edu> <8737g6ly1c.fsf@gnus.org> <20170126180611.GA7965@holos.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485454718 1376 195.159.176.226 (26 Jan 2017 18:18:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:18:38 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 23738@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 19:18:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWock-0007Oi-Tl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:18:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40431 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWocm-0004Zu-Tz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:18:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWocZ-0004W4-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:18:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWocU-0008ME-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWocT-0008MA-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWocT-0007JH-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:18:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 23738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23738.148545463328043 (code B ref 23738); Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 18:17:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWobg-0007I1-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:17:13 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWobf-0007FR-S8 for 23738@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:17:12 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.50.220.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.50.220] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWobc-0008Ns-Mv; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:17:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170126180611.GA7965@holos.localdomain> (Mark Oteiza's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:06:11 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128580 Archived-At: Mark Oteiza writes: > I don't think I've ever used message-mode's buffer name to tell which > email it is, looking at the subject is easier. I certainly have never > used eww's buffer names to tell what website they are on, seeing how the > urls or titles are presented plainly in 3 different ways. > > IMO The original report doesn't make sense. The buffer names have > nothing to do with being able to use and manipulate multiple eww > buffers. I think there's value in being able to type `C-x b fsf RET' to go the buffer that has the FSF web page, or whatever. Especially for people with disabilities. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no