From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Thorpe Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'? Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 21:17:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87vaspejvr.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> References: <87poizyz4m.fsf@secondfloor.xyz> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486243091 13217 195.159.176.226 (4 Feb 2017 21:18:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 21:18:11 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 22:18:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ca7ie-000397-94 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 22:18:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca7ij-0002g6-OH for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca7hy-0002ey-03 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:17:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca7hu-0005mo-Rt for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:17:21 -0500 Original-Received: from outbound-smtp03.blacknight.com ([81.17.249.16]:43095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca7hu-0005kn-Lv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 16:17:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail06.blacknight.ie [81.17.255.152]) by outbound-smtp03.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B27B99152 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 21:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: (qmail 12158 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2017 21:17:13 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO RTLaptop) (rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com@[51.37.51.74]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES128-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 4 Feb 2017 21:17:13 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87poizyz4m.fsf@secondfloor.xyz> (message from Christopher Pinon on Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:15:21 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 81.17.249.16 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:112241 Archived-At: Christopher Pinon writes: ... > During my private tests, I used three other email addresses that I have: > myusername AT domain1, myusername AT domain2, and myusername AT > domain3. These are different addresses (because different domains), but > 'myusername' is the same in each case. What I found is that 'r' in Rmail > did not add these addresses to "CC" or "To", which is what puzzled me. > > As soon as I used an address of the form anotherusername AT domain in > "CC" or "To", 'r' in Rmail behaved as expected (i.e., as according to > the manual) and added it to "CC" or "To". > > In sum, 'r' in Rmail appears to treat the addresses myusername AT > domain1, myusername AT domain2, and myusername AT domain3 as the same > address, which is a bit unfortunate. In practice, it's not likely to be > a significant issue (it was an artifact of my private tests), but it > nevertheless seems a little odd for 'r' in Rmail to treat such addresses > as the same. This is an obscure case. On the other hand, it should work. So, this looks like a bug to me. I have never encountered this problem in practice when using Rmail though. BR, Robert Thorpe