From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of emacs-25 branch Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:39:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaotxrvi.fsf@detlef> References: <83mvalc483.fsf@gnu.org> <83fugdbfzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvakppt2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r2zwa759.fsf@gnu.org> <83shjynqmz.fsf@gnu.org> <874lwehzxa.fsf@detlef> <83o9umnjep.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495438773 10345 195.159.176.226 (22 May 2017 07:39:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 07:39:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 22 09:39:29 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dChw8-0002Xv-8m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 09:39:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dChwC-0006CI-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 03:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dChw6-0006C1-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 03:39:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dChw3-0004sJ-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 03:39:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:51505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dChw3-0004rw-EC; Mon, 22 May 2017 03:39:23 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.47.172]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGj8j-1d8bC916bh-00DULn; Mon, 22 May 2017 09:39:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83o9umnjep.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 May 2017 21:39:58 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:i1Ob6yvQOL7cSiM+XSebffkwBxrxq9WOIU/mDiJvRFgd93nGB8D LxKVyQSY3u8KAz2b0DlE7PHQYcW9VkRIgkvIUt0fo8hCLukR2eGEbheoJ7TjF5M23hTpoYe Pc97due/RvquzW1oF+LVj2LMlqGNt/MV7ONwxqzgl4hvFFOJs8OMJQAew4/eXZcMFbR896D 5BtFCo9z+iIG1QAubf2yQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DqUUEdWbn2Q=:aLaH5idFdZK4MECEivJMKQ yEmFy8X/XAoRrssn0EFvdzcoVTxu9Lq/B0nClCDl9gVhx5KxTCjUlmp+E1vn+CVmF+68ArH3J 2n093mvVqNn900zo5IuH9s36P1ja6dau7U4cj4xLM6GWm8666mo2YyFUYdM4cTE9ypdUq8vCg /7PeCDhTowPY5F36R0VQ9CKPydnAongw6SPpKf540VSPveoV2Dx4w4A/logSBul8Q0wvCFJlf hXS6zKbb8TGRTI9eYsFRdVGLLDjP91ahZCjLkbouwRbc5lVyq2qT0JB8e514UqPC+QCKvLHW+ Inf8lC0agx16dDbgrqtP3APGLltRgF/DjeVBZxdqnfse41tR0f9QXlABQtXQHF8uzQdYi43Iu f6mlDFEY4xkmZFE58Y9ymwaFVd/VkSvlrs2QvBtOSC8jpZKqpN+vmPEZmV+FRiMZDYh1abLvS MHvw63D9bCQqF1UGdA6be9lJVY67kR0lqS1WgM43R/SgI714pKMqn1GzVE5aqxMX3hhTpwRmW /ITVMHEReYcTuq74Z0FqHHVNOobHLWIiSrqngL3k0NqKkPGDboxBed/K3zl1gOhxpEkqUg/Y9 Qf8W0NJG8Fp8LLb0TSNeLw0y1GT9j8PKs75aMrf52c1NxWTWi3dccN1dIZyZ6NKuyxgyX+54B f4K6idTm1Rv0XxXAEeH51Is0NZwJl8u26d2K3UwPATT4/ikwG8PyWPtF87TEdgHLY2DOBwP+W rIGuntZUd+uZGCZdx9ilsV1OO/3gn9vUqd9ZIQ2SA3Lw2lhC/dtSEpICwCmQAVV+mIYjfPQp X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215084 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> There's also the bug that Tramp is blocked with OpenSSH 7.x(*), which >> I've fixed recently in Emacs 26.1. I'll backport it to the emacs-25 >> branch, because I'll expect more people being hit by this in the near >> future. Will do next days. > > Is the fix just in 6de77cfa9da1, or are there other changes needed for > this? Exactly this, nothing else. Is it OK to push it to the emacs-25 branch? Best regards, Michael.