From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Commit 49c0ff2 "Don't bind org-agenda .." Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:59:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87vanqps3s.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <87a855of9m.fsf@bzg.fr> <87fuevdc6c.fsf@kyleam.com> <87mv93vhsf.fsf@bzg.fr> <83efuewv9r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497974545 19278 195.159.176.226 (20 Jun 2017 16:02:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:02:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/26.0 (gnu/linux) Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, kyle@kyleam.com, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 20 18:02:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dNLbe-0004Qo-9M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:02:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49504 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNLbe-0005Ho-92 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNLZR-0004SB-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNLZQ-0006k0-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNLZL-0006iN-5a; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from lputeaux-656-1-166-229.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr ([217.128.191.229]:51620 helo=bzg.fr) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dNLZK-0007Mn-4d; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:59:54 -0400 Original-Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77D0838BA1D; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:59:51 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83efuewv9r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:09:36 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215828 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks. Since this is Org's _stable_ release, which AFAIU you > recommend to all users, the decision to merge it with Emacs master is > really a no-brainer. Any incompatibilities that this merge could > bring are already out in the open, and you still decided to recommend > this version to your users, right? So I see no reasons whatsoever why > we would want to keep this out of the Emacs master branch. > > Am I missing something? No. But John has been waiting (for ages) for the review I sent yesterday, so I'd rather wait for his feedback. John, just cc'ing you, in case you missed the thread. -- Bastien