From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:00:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87vajowy1f.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507536079 15030 195.159.176.226 (9 Oct 2017 08:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier To: Michael Heerdegen , Emacs Development Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 09 10:01:03 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szi-00014Q-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:00:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szq-0007j2-0N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Szf-0007ia-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:01:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1SzZ-0005Q0-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:46962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1SzZ-0005Oq-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 04:00:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1507536045; bh=gcl4iWZahEGDOqBQun3lpedYwftAetYHX5WHQAWsT8o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SPXKyADwRP7rl/AT1oM80g/GoLQevPpQ9lLQL8ku5/Gwo8ihyYanbHgFh64cfhIda+8EPSURNmHI2J9ou49UmPfNfSEm6NwuNMTHXJT+PhbE8jIDdCLsmR1c5x9qafqu3gh2kmPLw2DbZvncVZWz+HaQPuAv+vG7gNfOPFHT86c= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219291 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Michael Heerdegen writes: > Hi, Hi Michael, > An alternative name would be `delayed-let'. I think it would be very > convenient. I think `thunk-let' is a good name. > What do people think about this idea? I like it! Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEKNO+2FH986tX/vk8IzWHpHwgeRAFAlnbLKwACgkQIzWHpHwg eRB0fwf/eETo/ISLdOz9m1y+ICZQCrd5GmFPvJU8GKbXqOt7Pqf+cfTrajLSv5GK 2gsqHUh4Bb9A9abYnGnPcNqlRubSGij5iVIu+stRr3xkmkEyo+TwnaudyJ5CZEEC T0M6jiokc9nNY1FxPdJO8PBtSriMcFApuH0kXNkWyZoR+ZA2zTHB/ruujHVGsBCS 3U0RErHarr+19+96IXsvg0JvLbdzJDPtUbf/VCgQsctvOZPOhru1/6dt48YuAdQb c11pQLeuGH/Nudlr5Dfk7kxjhSyWNaU4/OeCk7+tT1nlKfxrepQToX0xeWH7XBQ9 thXGcNbowkoQW4vtPTNCgTUbDBZIfA== =HrXb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--