From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gemini Lasswell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/accurate-warning-pos: Solid progress: the branch now bootstraps. Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:03:58 -0800 Message-ID: <87va4hhh69.fsf@runbox.com> References: <20181125193050.GH27152@ACM> <2c2ae483-3309-f79d-07a5-30af1f49058b@cs.ucla.edu> <20181125212920.GK27152@ACM> <60ac9dfc-b540-89f9-68ea-ec7cceaa8511@cs.ucla.edu> <83in0kijz0.fsf@gnu.org> <9e216e61-7d95-94f0-cbee-593b4f32ced2@cs.ucla.edu> <20181126184359.GG4030@ACM> <55044caa-18fb-9e9a-81b4-3912f64d0aa4@cs.ucla.edu> <20181127074336.GA4705@ACM> <0ec5806a-0cc6-8b9f-6bc2-97875e36a511@cs.ucla.edu> <20181127211539.GB4705@ACM> <8c38f335-b25d-9ef6-110c-6efc4fda9d67@cs.ucla.edu> <587da59a-eed1-9fdd-f362-ea72510413dc@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543384950 7794 195.159.176.226 (28 Nov 2018 06:02:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 06:02:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, Paul Eggert , michael_heerdegen@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 28 07:02:25 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRsvZ-0001uc-0y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:02:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46165 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRsxf-00066o-Fo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:04:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRsxV-00065k-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRsxQ-0001vg-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:50106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRsxO-0001uj-Sx; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:04:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=WGoMaMm/ozfuI749Az0m7lQD7H3h6dMvjp9pmNVHyhY=; b=h5g0gjHbhZTKHei+HERwqm0YUr f7Obx8VTDI1ieKQeo3jnQ9BodIaHxLlxL146sykr4GuSZpEgQxfzAy3OgSzBXZ+0fL9IowN2jJxyz KYqRcBVSaQWq9PmNrmx0tF09pXQqAbltqLjhnSliyFUdlVIknFSM+Jq330RTBx69viKje2dRT/ra+ bckht2hLZZdFMBrdWFUaG/ap16Uv+YifddcyWOFyqSkIKeK6b9bkQ7AmCHX2xdpqiKAMgxpnKwyWb t9ARXvFyD/zorcYsJJHwzTGNquXAt5ynByRomTi7JdVg8I2aUMJ8wHA4wJ+cUElifJMs64FqCeLTK u6iATkTg==; Original-Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRsxL-00081u-0k; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:04:15 +0100 Original-Received: by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1gRsx7-0006Da-DH; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:04:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:43:31 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.220.196.211 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231473 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > E.g. for a macro like `when` where the edebug spec is just `t` (which > means all the arguments are Elisp expressions) we don't need to > de-annotate anything at all. And for `dolist` whose edebug spec is > ((symbolp form &optional form) body), we can use that debug spec to find > that the first arg needs to be partially de-annotated, and the rest can > be left fully annotated. Why not just use Edebug's reader? It's already solved the de-annotation problem.