From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only signal package.el warnings when needed Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:13:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87va2qx4z8.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <83k1j7dyu3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547503936 29725 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2019 22:12:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:12:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 14 23:12:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjASn-0007bN-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:12:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjAUu-0004Y3-Kk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjAUK-0004Xr-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjAUJ-0006IP-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=48784 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjAUI-0006HU-Bd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:13:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gjAS6-0006dC-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:11:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:s+n46KSq21PKTPvPMNk47HJLW2I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232350 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > But we didn't actually hear complaints about that, did we? I wonder > why should we complicate this stuff even more before collecting enough > real-life experience, which will allow us to have some basis for code > changes -- provided that changes are indeed in order. FWIW, I was surprised and annoyed by that warning. Not to the level of complaining on public, but thinking that it is... less than elegant to automatically modify the init files and some time later to pester the user with warnings about that same modification he was forced to accept. Not to mention the noise it creates for those of us that occasionally work with multiple Emacs versions and the same init files.