bug#35486: 26.1; insert-kbd-macro now creates unreadable list code

[Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 675 bytes --]

severity 35486 minor
tags 35486 + patch
quit

npostavs@gmail.com writes:

> I think the kmacro-bind-to-key is important to preserve the way macro
> counters work, but it seems like we should be able to add some special
> casing to at least get something like this:
>
> (fset 'approve
>    (lambda (&optional arg)
>      "Keyboard macro."
>      (interactive "p")
>      (kmacro-exec-ring-item (quote ([?\M-x ?u ?n ?d ?i ?g ?e ?s ?t ?i ?f ?y return ?d ?d ?\C-x ?q ?d ?e ?\M-k] 0 "%d")) arg)))

Following an existing FIXME, the following patch produces

(fset 'approve
   (kmacro-lambda-form [?\M-x ?u ?n ?d ?i ?g ?e ?s ?t ?i ?f ?y return ?d ?d ?\C-x ?q ?d ?e ?\M-k] 0 "%d"))


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3095 bytes --]

From fe7420c67f18195aa85853dbfc6afcdf65e9d5a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 13:24:15 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Improve printing for named keyboard macros (Bug#35486)

* lisp/macros.el (macros--insert-vector-macro): New function,
extracted from insert-kbd-macro.
(insert-kbd-macro): Use it and kmacro-extract-lambda to produce nicer
expressions for macros produced by kmacro-lambda-form.
---
 lisp/kmacro.el |  1 +
 lisp/macros.el | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/kmacro.el b/lisp/kmacro.el
index fc34e16708..01dc058614 100644
--- a/lisp/kmacro.el
+++ b/lisp/kmacro.el
@@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ (defun kmacro-end-call-mouse (event)
 ;; letters and digits, provided that we inhibit the keymap while
 ;; executing the macro later on (but that's controversial...)
 
+;;;###autoload
 (defun kmacro-lambda-form (mac &optional counter format)
   "Create lambda form for macro bound to symbol or key."
   (if counter
diff --git a/lisp/macros.el b/lisp/macros.el
index ba6a840d60..4b38506d8a 100644
--- a/lisp/macros.el
+++ b/lisp/macros.el
@@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ (require 'kmacro)
 ;;;###autoload
 (defalias 'name-last-kbd-macro #'kmacro-name-last-macro)
 
+(defun macros--insert-vector-macro (definition)
+  "Print DEFINITION, a vector, into the current buffer."
+  (dotimes (i (length definition))
+    (let ((char (aref definition i)))
+      (insert (if (zerop i) ?\[ ?\s))
+      (if (characterp char)
+          (princ (prin1-char char) (current-buffer))
+        (prin1 char (current-buffer)))))
+  (insert ?\]))
+
 ;;;###autoload
 (defun insert-kbd-macro (macroname &optional keys)
   "Insert in buffer the definition of kbd macro MACRONAME, as Lisp code.
@@ -111,19 +121,17 @@ (defun insert-kbd-macro (macroname &optional keys)
 		     (delete-region (point) (1+ (point)))
 		     (insert "\\M-\\C-?"))))))
       (if (vectorp definition)
-	  (let ((len (length definition)) (i 0) char)
-	    (while (< i len)
-	      (insert (if (zerop i) ?\[ ?\s))
-	      (setq char (aref definition i)
-		    i (1+ i))
-	      (if (not (numberp char))
-                  (prin1 char (current-buffer))
-                (princ (prin1-char char) (current-buffer))))
-	    (insert ?\]))
-        ;; FIXME: For kmacros, we shouldn't write the (lambda ...)
-        ;; gunk but instead we should write something more abstract like
-        ;; (kmacro-create [<keys>] 0 "%d").
-	(prin1 definition (current-buffer))))
+          (macros--insert-vector-macro definition)
+        (pcase (kmacro-extract-lambda definition)
+          (`(,vecdef ,counter ,format)
+           (insert "(kmacro-lambda-form ")
+           (macros--insert-vector-macro vecdef)
+           (insert " ")
+           (prin1 counter (current-buffer))
+           (insert " ")
+           (prin1 format (current-buffer))
+           (insert ")"))
+          (_ (prin1 definition (current-buffer))))))
     (insert ")\n")
     (if keys
         (let ((keys (or (where-is-internal (symbol-function macroname)
-- 
2.11.0