From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9ybr913.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <46f308ff-5a70-8ccc-310b-48167088ff5a@yandex.ru> <87woirsvdb.fsf@telefonica.net> <87sgtfsswd.fsf@telefonica.net> <76f6370c-e8b7-bc59-634c-c48ea7af7f70@yandex.ru> <87lfz7sqb9.fsf@telefonica.net> <874l5vsokw.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="34891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 15 18:13:26 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQwWz-0008y0-HO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:13:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQwWy-000271-Gs for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:13:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQwWn-00026k-Pc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:13:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQwWl-000695-SJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=54314 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQwWl-0005zQ-EJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQwWb-0008SY-5T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:13:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:VRqplUWzfRZfkyhKeGj/8TjROls= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120401 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: >> The heuristics of comment-dwim not always gives the desired results. If >> I know that I want to comment or uncomment a region, I prefer a method >> that will do precisely that instead of something that tries to guess my >> intention and can end doing the opposite thing depending on the presence >> of commented-out text somewhere on the region. > > I don't see you arguing for adding a comment-region binding in other > major modes. I can show you my .emacs.el instead.