From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36680: 27.0.50; undo-tree visualizer flickering with display-buffer-reuse-frames -> t Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:13:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9vzyrds.fsf@web.de> References: <878sszdjj1.fsf@web.de> <73a9bb70-d34f-9229-ca4b-12701c3082f8@gmx.at> <871ryo12zj.fsf@web.de> <87v9w0yrkd.fsf@web.de> <069eff63-937d-16d8-3273-68e849782c10@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="252288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36680@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 19 00:25:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpn-0013WI-DP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:25:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40970 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpm-00024J-DN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpj-000248-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpi-0000g3-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpi-0000fk-KJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpi-0002Eh-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36680 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36680-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36680.15634886718549 (code B ref 36680); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 22:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36680) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2019 22:24:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpC-0002Dp-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:24:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:59873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoEpB-0002DZ-BU for 36680@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:24:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1563488661; bh=wRNpu/hUlxIyjm5C7YFfaBha2cYr8JUZvZtMuwdD8PE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:References; b=YrEkXhhdTH4M3E28VCVQPAz1fSdGoY2r+qDogm6OyhjUR3cjuVq5YIFDDysYF86iU FFpYIgLixz6IPi2sLsJf/Fuks8xJ4NY4BoQI1OcK/PtZBiWckUgRG7aLHx3TwTwdGw pN0k/UXp3JdSflqn4/JzCf+XvW6Mw18rgF8BacoM= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.208.178.242]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNLNt-1hmJyK1fAH-006zew; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 23:17:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <069eff63-937d-16d8-3273-68e849782c10@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:49:47 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:unWIbSpDxLsKiTdar1fKLkSuvz6K8D9pIDr72IvCMeeDgLOpDar YhI1BMIyFooUmAmjSg1/Z6LQl1Fs7CJMj+NllKh6F63kygoy6W+O9K9sRGi/wX9VPMXkyol sl7dJZ284yXhTdkn47UEO79ylQnWvXXLb4ReCsGIu4wU6W5rGDzwywIsUBbnP2YBm+LpCRh iesLoV98Z9Pei8HpW33aQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:J4rh9a1kSWA=:0r/+mSYg2yUuxungyp9gsH pR+INr+kMGTSthBMGUEUEAL3gP8X+BBMiz7ZD+ER9kLVibGz03erfz7njNjMjnOuLzS9kPCe5 u+m+5gEpXvSoelLlnXF0VjKbTiX9qLZWxN1+d81HIbEGVVxIICnahCDKgCyw7a/ZerkhsaEf9 ofEl646V8L0xhpKFl1vy1PEs0D6HiTj4BUI1FUuRgp1BSKP26I+qsjkeII1Kiq0DqTaYFoDBz OomPbaGJgcBej0LcoRG1VtjxsXq7kv+kt7nL9mu7el0VtrBVuhbVdEJjZg/xGwG4UmvjLLzb1 Tikj9YMdnRruf+DALjNt8J+FOpmn3T8cRdw19J+5mvSICgL+GaVMEtfYdCb01uPmG9WLXDRTa D+XROjrxctTZndejXDZ+NkBT6fU4HWi+HWSr7hPpUxwnGJ7CcYxmatLN90CvdQih834UJeXiR SMP5eo0cOgOmAnADJQCPxTo8ad73OJlujNGiI5MufWsx3QHR3vwD3m/xLJXWYZlynEqzq3ko4 /WvH8I1vVgzXhOwGjq1R6ZJESYnk0NOKtPEmsB5Z2GBJQ1H5FgcJdJn3xm+8odrPfYgeGjO8f XFxvF7vsaETw/XPJ5MvVv2J40oTID9WujXxR9uqQgUZXCsG6ajDHx/T7SqNdV2QPXY1yFTgT8 4OOo8ELdoHUMwwtDgs6dHnWUHq9zyUce1KXLwsfMe586FMLL5jQ/e1CDwTPlUQayclddYUvrE 7dF5ITJ+sQcteKyK8X0ax4Nw1Lq0cz50KrB/gMBddeJFOUBGA6RitOv62jbsq13U/DIOdQf1 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163337 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > You probably should have used an 'inhibit-switch-frame' ALIST entry > then. Where would you suggest to do that, as a user, without changing code? Potentially any arbitrary buffer can be affected. > OK. Then please, try the attached patch. Yes, good, that's what I want - thanks. I hope no existing code relies on the old behavior. But I think it's an improvement, also in other situations. > Note that when there's no suitable window on the selected frame you > will still get the annoying behavior. In this case it's not trivial what could be done better. Let's say that this is not part of my report. Thanks, Michael.