From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20056: 25.0.50; Remove non Common Lisp stuff from cl*.el libraries Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:58:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87v9ves8vu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <54FC9340.2030703@dancol.org> <4fd5309f-c0bd-486d-8612-a2f724643a2e@default> <54FC9ED3.9000102@dancol.org> <67b0e9f7-5f3f-4a6f-8f07-91e88d881c3b@default> <54FCBCCE.5010402@dancol.org> <87tvazpw8l.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <871ry3t13k.fsf@gmail.com> <87o916bse0.fsf@gmail.com> <87mugqlex9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="59313"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 20056@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= , Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 03 14:59:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1httdI-000FJ5-B9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 14:59:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40026 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1httdG-0005jl-Q6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60543) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1httco-0005jY-Nk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1httcm-0004My-S3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1httck-0004Bv-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1httck-0007rd-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 20056-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20056.156483713530216 (code B ref 20056); Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2019 12:58:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1httcc-0007rI-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com ([209.85.166.46]:38559) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1httca-0007r5-Pb for 20056@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 08:58:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id j6so38472924ioa.5 for <20056@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 05:58:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pyP/VxQY7NZTKEudSCEmStY4Ho0BmkX7AeUqXEU5Amw=; b=iFJCFbGf8tp8932FRJz4GIHnK2PA3MOxCVVZtZuHySM94N6VhsqlPsv0VgVlNx/Acd BrJStcRLigxAbpaW+Fmck7+0XRFebF4vjiHSAeZYYE8ZHIY6Au0P10MDZi9P8Z4UBvLl PJdwy1uyimUsaC6LNJxRHuUr9EQjAkCFs5rSYisPMKOUsBD479bXAM9myeVBmwZntqmv z39TeqraFjMI3Jm2pb1x61rrJkA5MdrSlXRSzDuPnyTnkVRBRrxO9J8WoXy/nxIVVMQC nYWvb6dIGV/E7dw450msy0nNVTV8EERXpFPx+Bo104llKLwOtzXjBIlEjvfz+2g+EFN4 Jadg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pyP/VxQY7NZTKEudSCEmStY4Ho0BmkX7AeUqXEU5Amw=; b=Q8LpgRd2S6CdcOhuffwaWu+BSoJ3/ewcZFogSCtlIPG0DZacKsef3A+OZFl15hbRa7 ua1tGEgzuHZaf1tFjPtYM2OCFgEkmMnwRNO+3nWkGEASTLq0059fIGvJmO2cDzcQwXfX eSgE1XbzMrHfsyNJ/tbXgsy/FUeADat01yX2Xt35UUnCNWnoxKryJwUkIFkPnCOsy8O3 goJ05j30VXC3yzJFk/Nn9B7+Mc9Z6g5+KzD8CIu2HjD010orVBgRiqmtfIeXsrWUNdDC j8veMTD0vKkuMAgs9eh2krkurXfGUoMkIhpbdjXvbYroBJYMqa43QUai6KDaFhE7+EdL Z/ng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVxALnha9C7+o0entQTMsS5dFIy3bs8XIAlzACcATz7KIoA7dOs VrrhObC/50/MPe/Y2QLfNdM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2dxjz2yOzFWKVML8PfKsmMVv0ZLsTHBWQYhVD8sDiNe+sLABzReJrpqPTw0Y1uuEZ1tiJIw== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:dc08:: with SMTP id s8mr3466129ioc.209.1564837127160; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 05:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm69874280ioh.36.2019.08.03.05.58.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Aug 2019 05:58:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mugqlex9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:30:10 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164449 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec writes: > >> Considering your proposal in particular, what about shiftf, rotatef? >> What makes them different? > > And incf/decf. That letf and callf are not defined by Common Lisp.