From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36940: tests slowness and failure after recent Tramp changes Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:31:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9v0avhm.fsf@gmx.de> References: <57e233fe-19e9-6eac-7fd5-7e181879d4df@cs.ucla.edu> <87h86uh2l6.fsf@gmx.de> <1bec46f5-01e7-5ea4-5562-501185d80ecf@cs.ucla.edu> <87v9vaf4sk.fsf@gmx.de> <87r25xf1dn.fsf@gmx.de> <8736ibkbne.fsf@gmx.de> <87mughfj96.fsf@gmx.de> <470b50ab-6658-e3cb-cd59-916c398c442f@cs.ucla.edu> <87h86of1tm.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="169906"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36940@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 14 12:33:29 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqau-000i1q-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:33:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqat-0006pw-8E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqaX-0006pe-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqaV-0004Dp-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqaT-0004DE-Ss for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqaT-0007BE-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36940 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36940-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36940.156577873827547 (code B ref 36940); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36940) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2019 10:32:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqZl-0007AF-Vu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:47349) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hxqZj-0007A1-IA for 36940@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 06:32:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1565778713; bh=J3sQEQ9mR26bU43N9B+d+INswHkNJTndkY2VWQT4XEU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PVdvBNP4KMyo6nypgywzPZkAU85g6fyDL+tldmkuuohk0h2a8cPrjM0z8Ey8Rvs8S WcWUgp2RPsmycCTPKexwBch7kly4yTTPkpcvpUuZDamwV2ZwftoLsFfeZ67NGGu1oM r4XeB0TrFu7PIC67NwzebzLeZqcHDsUfcWkHID9A= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.149.212]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M0tr1-1iHj0A1bsl-00v6ek; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:31:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h86of1tm.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sun, 11 Aug 2019 12:12:21 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HCm1ILsVBU1gDBcfeHbhCy5tSJakH0+E1UJfw6Z02GHYjgZsT4o pmKy1Gl/76C0chBwUH499jy2CpD4RlSILsXhztDJs90arASN8IC6FChNEvcSkOx7FjM2LJa 7MdMbq7Y8ZhwSxCYeFxga0uvMDcXrjBzz4YhkPkSr2gXJRsfoNh3zcoHJ0oPCXxoy9dUTGJ IK4BFEPe3sHj3bLelGtZA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:M9K7ET7MjTY=:YLObcuCeKbupY36BRNxQtx RH08BCTm5GR+eiAYYjELczZ8YonfPqTlS5V8Khz48O0OWPdGnSSEcA1fxiX8PPMrPXQwmdeJT T9d8MIM6MwRdIPSgdrcie2h05962tq4uD4nSW9rIzLjEFTB4UQyf8Fmdh7n2NKTw7A4ogl0te 85Mc9/6t76QwKJhEMM7cPTo+ctXTe9UY5lLoR5yFQP6f/4NfKdmaVZoHree87C2C4Y1gnwwgy 1ztZNHXGHbSAWgkEJvpmu80OvM/kOLE6vfiKbZPZuLUtxxqYC7yzKTsct/mjocB56ijhrCeOu AVZCTAA50zbhI1qf/r/MMnLqLyBmW+Iefr0+rGa2Sx8ZM4Y71xyxAXxHoAhd93T8vQ1t99U0h r7AaWO+bTKIWvsSGKnv2tRTMsYz8fEY28Bp+dkV2ueRanET0f7v2RosaAGBEY4Y7dG6Y+PUZ4 rrB3XrbswwJFFuxlvRFDt1kNciOXhBy5xuMI7GEEHPsFwqhhHEqrR2yWdhspjpHIe5WbPxR78 UMvDQEDRUvuN9Jj4OdrKBm4LvGtmzO7/HIgqUOUG/kNE2o6bpwEmrkZcMsrxbywo8C63wKXrZ JVYzRd51YSUTUYsGNPylmxIr4ez1t1oNdRsCA3w6sSgxAq3/P8MCAZlYSHpz796b/S17MiFFD GUSzwcjaV19T1PwKVs+/4N/oQUPxrj561C2SwSeSA8HWt9mM208RcIeqFMAB+5XAHRfMW9Fhi AqhAbKz9QS1FMRHLuXsnSdvyUgkujSjuR4pB0tGKBhQYsSo8RDgwkwQrelFcxPK8bKnGz5A6 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164970 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: Hi Paul, >> Can we do the equivalent of 'touch nonce-file' on the remote machine, >> and then retrieve the nonce-file's timestamp? That should be a >> reasonably-reliable way of getting a remote timestamp at the start of >> the test. > > "touch ..." would work only for ssh-like Tramp methods, which is the > minority. I've applied a similar approach, using the modification time > of the very first remote file created in the test, as start test time. I guess there's nothing left to do with this bug. Is it OK to close? Best regards, Michael.