From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5557: is undefined Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9t5suxx.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87k19o32b2.fsf@gnus.org> <838sq4a1mm.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgoczbe5.fsf@gnus.org> <835zl8a0ur.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8z0zasn.fsf@gnus.org> <834l0sa0d0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="53773"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 5557@debbugs.gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 03 17:37:57 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3Ax-000Dq1-HJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:37:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3Aw-0000F1-Bx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3AP-0008T5-N9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3A7-0000Ud-T4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3A7-0000UZ-Px for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3A5-0005MF-JV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:37:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5557 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 5557-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5557.157011696220521 (code B ref 5557); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5557) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 15:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG398-0005Kl-ID for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:50362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG393-0005KR-KU for 5557@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:35:58 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iG390-0000i3-AT; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:35:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834l0sa0d0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 01 Oct 2019 19:36:59 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168230 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm guessing that the OP wanted to have the display scrolled no matter > where on display the user turns the mouse wheel, but evidently that's > not how things are defined by default. If we decide to change that, > it IMO makes little sense to do that only for the margins, but not for > the fringes or the scroll bar. That's true. Hm... perhaps the user has really big margins? That would make the issue more apparent there -- and it's difficult to say what else the scroll wheel should do there other than work the same as in the main portion of the buffer. But I guess we should just wait and see whether the user has any feedback on the use case here. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no