From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: can undo unamalgamation be turned off reliably and completely? Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:57:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9domtf0.fsf@telefonica.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8362"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 09:58:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjIXH-00026B-Qz for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:58:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjIXG-0007RQ-TB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 03:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjIWx-0007R0-RL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 03:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from relayout01-redir.e.movistar.es ([86.109.101.201]:25045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjIWv-0007eZ-6q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 03:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from sky (211.red-79-146-31.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [79.146.31.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 981711563@telefonica.net) by relayout01.e.movistar.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CkMhM4QXCzfZyL; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:57:55 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2020 22:20:57 -0700") X-TnetOut-Country: IP: 79.146.31.211 | Country: ES X-TnetOut-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on relayout01 X-TnetOut-MsgID: 4CkMhM4QXCzfZyL.A868F X-TnetOut-SpamCheck: no es spam, clean X-TnetOut-From: ofv@wanadoo.es X-TnetOut-Watermark: 1607245075.78039@oK2jn6HoJhTDl979Ld+VJA Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=86.109.101.201; envelope-from=ofv@wanadoo.es; helo=relayout01-redir.e.movistar.es X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:125748 Archived-At: Samuel Wales writes: > this has been a struggle for 20+ years. maybe longer.. > > emacs hardcodes 20 characters [as of emacs 25-ish, commands also] for > amalgamation. (hardcoding?) > > i never want this. no matter what. (except, if some internal code > relies on it, then i want that to not break.) > > what can i do to get rid of undo amalgamation so that i never have to > deal with this issue again? As per C-h v amalgamating-undo-limit : (setq amalgamating-undo-limit 1) Not tested.