From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Survey: Toolbars Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 10:48:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9cq43ns.fsf@logand.com> References: <87o8iv3ac3.fsf@gnus.org> <877dpjp30g.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87zh2fnmwq.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8ivumn5.fsf@telefonica.net> <87v9d3nkxk.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6u4imxq.fsf@logand.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35257"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 25 10:50:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ksjjU-00092B-VD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 10:50:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55310 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksjjU-00054N-1j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 04:50:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksjiQ-0004db-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 04:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:37754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ksjiO-0002Uy-9y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 04:48:54 -0500 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5C6819F111; Fri, 25 Dec 2020 10:48:41 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 26.3 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261727 Archived-At: On Thu 24 Dec 2020 at 23:29, Richard Stallman wrote: > This is equivalent to deciding to consider white-on-black to be a mode > of display rather than a property of the document. I think it makes > sense. It is trivial for monochromatic documents. The question is: What should happen if there was another third color in the document? Should that third color stay the same on black display and white paper? Emacs kind of solves this for display by manually defining faces for each use-case (black or white background). But is there a better, automatic way suitable for printing? Or maybe the buffer should simply use the same background as paper? Is it possible to reverse reverse-video per buffer?