From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposing changes to adjust_frame_size Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:49:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87v97ww8h4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <69a5e928-2998-f776-fa0d-f35e6ab1e65d@gmx.at> <20210505.194756.2198057137743556501.masm@luna.pink.masm11.me> <20210505.230733.1330791046879877132.masm@luna.pink.masm11.me> <87a6p9knr9.fsf@gnu.org> <9712b3f0-c442-61fc-93a6-773ffcde1c2e@gmx.at> <87y2cswam6.fsf@gnu.org> <1b11ac72-6687-f2d4-1d9f-0619d6d2462c@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40008"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.13; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 10:52:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZkY-000AHV-Hs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:52:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leZkX-0002HF-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leZjQ-0001RC-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leZjQ-0001Yh-36; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:55149) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZjQ-0005rk-0d; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CF727C0054; Thu, 6 May 2021 04:51:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 May 2021 04:51:39 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdegtddgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhi lhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepve evieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffueeuudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecukfhp peekjedrudeifedrfedurdduheegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p57a31f9a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.163.31.154]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 6 May 2021 04:51:38 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <1b11ac72-6687-f2d4-1d9f-0619d6d2462c@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268955 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > This would include commit 483c5e953c12a95382bef4a3b6769a680c32fe86 in > addition to e9baa733b8cac00e008cb834abc8712c8c00beed but no other > ones. > >> If you want, I can bisect when I find some time, maybe this evening. > > Try to revert just these two commits first. I did so, and indeed, the issue vanishes. >> I have >> >> (setq default-frame-alist '((width . 90) >> (height . 50))) >> >> which is basically a relict of the times where I've not used a tiling >> WM. > > Does anything change when you remove this? I'd doubt it. No. Bye, Tassilo