From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: For text processing, which is more powerful, emacs or perl? Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 18:42:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9275uyv.fsf@mbork.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39893"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: help-gnu-emacs , Hongyi Zhao To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 08 18:43:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsxr-000ADO-Vq for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 18:43:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsxp-0001Wt-TE for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsxP-0001Wj-C3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:36980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYsxK-0005Ul-IX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 12:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E95E6AC9; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:42:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZeUuflPN2N1g; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:42:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (83.8.170.120.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl [83.8.170.120]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D299E681D; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:42:35 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.110.48.8; envelope-from=mbork@mbork.pl; helo=mail.mojserwer.eu X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:133656 Archived-At: On 2020-12-19, at 13:25, Jean Louis wrote: > * Hongyi Zhao [2020-12-19 15:18]: >> > You may use any tools. Including you may combine tools. >> >> 1. What about use emacs as an IDE to debug perl code? >> 2. Nowadays, it seems that many packages on cpan cannot be updated in >> time like those packages on pypi for python, so I think whether this >> means that Perl is obsolete. > > You may use Emacs to debug perl code, I guess it is M-x cperl-mode > > CPAN and Perl are not obsolete, not at all. Well, nor is COBOL... -- Marcin Borkowski http://mbork.pl