From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53377: 28.0.91: Build fails on MSYS2/MinGW-w64 with Clang Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 04:32:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87v8yf6q17.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <874k5z8fao.fsf@telefonica.net> <87lezb2opb.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39990"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 53377@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 20 04:33:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOCt-000AH4-JD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 04:33:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43756 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOCr-0000FA-Mx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:33:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOC6-0000Ei-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:33:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOC6-0002Yh-Cg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOC6-0006lK-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 03:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53377 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53377-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53377.164264953925941 (code B ref 53377); Thu, 20 Jan 2022 03:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53377) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2022 03:32:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOBO-0006kK-T3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:32:19 -0500 Original-Received: from relayout04.e.movistar.es ([86.109.101.204]:44057 helo=relayout04-redir.e.movistar.es) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nAOBI-0006k1-Sg for 53377@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:32:17 -0500 Original-Received: from sky (234.red-88-17-68.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [88.17.68.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 981711563@telefonica.net) by relayout04.e.movistar.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JfSjx2Sbvz12RR; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 04:32:05 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87lezb2opb.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:14:24 +0800") X-TnetOut-Country: IP: 88.17.68.234 | Country: ES X-TnetOut-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on relayout04 X-TnetOut-MsgID: 4JfSjx2Sbvz12RR.ACC76 X-TnetOut-SpamCheck: no es spam, clean X-TnetOut-From: ofv@wanadoo.es X-TnetOut-Watermark: 1643254325.55365@xk3S2vBMDIempf8aGr+j2A X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224644 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Do we really want to support building Emacs with Clang on MS-Windows? > > AFAIU, it's support for that platform is miles behind GCC's, Your information is outdated. The only clear advantage GCC has over Clang is at being compatible with GCC. > so even if this specific build error was fixed, there would be other > problems preventing Emacs from working there. Nobody is asking you to work on this bug report, so feel free to ignore it and don't discourage others.